Current:Home > MyA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -PrimeFinance
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-18 05:58:53
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (53453)
Related
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- The Masked Singer's Ice King Might Be a Jonas Brother
- The boy was found in a ditch in Wisconsin in 1959. He was identified 65 years later.
- Harriet Tubman posthumously named a general in Veterans Day ceremony
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Horoscopes Today, November 10, 2024
- Sean Diddy Combs' Lawyers File New Motion for Bail, Claiming Evidence Depicts a Consensual Relationship
- Should Georgia bench Carson Beck with CFP at stake against Tennessee? That's not happening
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Auburn surges, while Kansas remains No. 1 in the USA TODAY Sports men's basketball poll
Ranking
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- California Gov. Gavin Newsom will spend part of week in DC as he tries to Trump-proof state policies
- John Robinson, former USC Trojans and Los Angeles Rams coach, dies at 89
- Indiana man is found guilty of murder in the 2017 killings of 2 teenage girls
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Wall Street makes wagers on the likely winners and losers in a second Trump term
- All the Ways Megan Fox Hinted at Her Pregnancy With Machine Gun Kelly
- Horoscopes Today, November 10, 2024
Recommendation
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
Brands Our Editors Are Thankful For in 2024
The Stanley x LoveShackFancy Collaboration That Sold Out in Minutes Is Back for Part 2—Don’t Miss Out!
Chicago Bears will ruin Caleb Williams if they're not careful | Opinion
'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
Congress returns to unfinished business and a new Trump era
Man killed by police in Minnesota was being sought in death of his pregnant wife
Rōki Sasaki is coming to MLB: Dodgers the favorite to sign Japanese ace for cheap?